Ingram & Goodwin v. Gill
39 So. 736, 145 Ala. 666, 1905 Ala. LEXIS 149
This text of 39 So. 736 (Ingram & Goodwin v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ingram & Goodwin v. Gill, 39 So. 736, 145 Ala. 666, 1905 Ala. LEXIS 149 (Ala. 1905).
Opinion
The attorneys having entered into an agreement in writing and filed in the cause to set down a plea for hearing on its sufficiency, the chancellor should not have disregarded the agreement and proceeded to hear the cause on the pleading and proof before hearing the plea.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
39 So. 736, 145 Ala. 666, 1905 Ala. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-goodwin-v-gill-ala-1905.