Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ingram Enterprises v. Langston

Ingram Enterprises v. Langston

611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1993 WL 9001
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2079
StatusPublished

This text of 611 So. 2d 115 (Ingram Enterprises v. Langston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram Enterprises v. Langston, 611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1993 WL 9001 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek a remand in this workers’ compensation appeal, showing that a transcript of the merits hearing cannot be prepared and the parties are unable to provide a satisfactory substitute for the transcript. In these circumstances, we find we must reverse and remand the order on appeal for a hearing de novo. See Arnold Lumber Co. v. Harris, 469 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, SMITH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
611 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1334, 1993 WL 9001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-enterprises-v-langston-fladistctapp-1993.