Ingnacio Zarategarcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2020
Docket05-20-00184-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Ingnacio Zarategarcia v. State (Ingnacio Zarategarcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingnacio Zarategarcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 27, 2020

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00184-CR

IGNACIO ZARATE-GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F19-75223-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Evans Opinion by Justice Nowell Ignacio Zarete-Garcia appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child.

Although the trial court imposed an agreed twenty-five-year sentence on September 26, 2019,

appellant did not file his notice of appeal until January 24, 2020. 1 Because appellant’s notice of

appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

A defendant perfects an appeal by filing with the trial court clerk, within thirty days after

the date sentence was imposed, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely filed

a motion for new trial, a written notice of appeal showing his desire to appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(b–c), 26.2(a). A timely filed notice of appeal is required to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction.

1 Appellant’s notice of appeal reflects he executed it on January 24, 2020. It was postmarked on January 27, 2020, and it was received for filing on January 31, 2020. Because appellant is incarcerated, he is deemed to have filed his notice of appeal, under the “prisoner mailbox rule,” when it was delivered to prison authorities for mailing, a date no earlier than January 24, 2020. See Campbell v. State, 320 S.W.3d 338, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010) (explaining prisoner mailbox rule). Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In the absence of a timely filed

notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Id.

The judgment shows the trial court imposed appellant’s sentence on September 26, 2019.

The clerk’s record does not show appellant filed a motion for new trial. Therefore, appellant’s

notice of appeal was due on Monday, October 28, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 26.2(a).

Because appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, we must dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction. Castillo, 369 S.W.3d at 198.

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 200184F.U05

–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

IGNACIO ZARATE-GARCIA, Appellant On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-20-00184-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F19-75223-T. Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Partida-Kipness and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 27th day of February, 2020.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. State
320 S.W.3d 338 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ingnacio Zarategarcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingnacio-zarategarcia-v-state-texapp-2020.