Inglese v. LiMandri
This text of 89 A.D.3d 604 (Inglese v. LiMandri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[605]*605Petitioner’s conviction of a crime directly related to the use of the subject license demonstrates poor moral character that adversely reflects on his fitness to hold a licensed position in the construction industry (Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 28-401.6, 28-401.19 [13]). The penalty imposed is not disproportionate to the offense (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]). The Commissioner properly considered the factors set forth in Correction Law § 753. Concur — Moskowitz, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 29 Misc 3d 1234(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 52136(U).]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A.D.3d 604, 932 N.Y.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inglese-v-limandri-nyappdiv-2011.