Inglese v. LiMandri

89 A.D.3d 604, 932 N.Y.2d 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[605]*605Petitioner’s conviction of a crime directly related to the use of the subject license demonstrates poor moral character that adversely reflects on his fitness to hold a licensed position in the construction industry (Administrative Code of City of NY §§ 28-401.6, 28-401.19 [13]). The penalty imposed is not disproportionate to the offense (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]). The Commissioner properly considered the factors set forth in Correction Law § 753. Concur — Moskowitz, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 29 Misc 3d 1234(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 52136(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inglese v. LiMandri, 89 A.D.3d 604, 932 N.Y.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

89 A.D.3d 604 (Inglese v. LiMandri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riglietti v. New York Dept. of Bldgs.
2025 NY Slip Op 32271(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Gallo v. LiMandri
102 A.D.3d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Duffy v. LiMandri
93 A.D.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)