Ingles v. Yurchak
This text of 125 A.D.2d 452 (Ingles v. Yurchak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Green, J.), dated July 15, 1985, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing their complaint for failure to establish a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law former § 671 (4) (now § 5102 [d]).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Based upon a review of the record, we conclude that Special Term did not err in granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In opposition to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden of making a prima facie showing of "serious injury” as defined in Insurance Law former § 671 (4) (now § 5102 [d]). In reaching this conclusion, we reject the plaintiffs’ contention that the submission of a medical affidavit is necessary in order to prevail on a sum[453]*453mary judgment motion claiming a failure to establish a serious injury (see, Padron v Hood, 124 AD2d 718; Popp v Kremer, 124 AD2d 720). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Fiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 A.D.2d 452, 509 N.Y.S.2d 382, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingles-v-yurchak-nyappdiv-1986.