Inglehart v. Slauson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Inglehart v. Slauson

249 A.D. 793, 292 N.Y.S. 325, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6027

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 793 (Inglehart v. Slauson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inglehart v. Slauson, 249 A.D. 793, 292 N.Y.S. 325, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6027 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In view of the form of the decision we construe the judgment dismissing the complaint, which w“e are affirming, as determining that the plaintiff is not entitled to a construction of the contract as one obligating the defendants or either of them to retire, sell or otherwise take up the plaintiff’s shares of stock, and as in nowise adjudicating any question relating to the term of the contract by which the defendants undertook substantially to use their best efforts to sell the plaintiff’s stock, or any possible breach thereof. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for declaratory judgment as to the rights of parties under a contract concerning disposition of certain shares of stock. The order denies motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In view of the form of the decision we construe the judgment dismissing the complaint, which w“e are affirming, as determining that the plaintiff is not entitled to a construction of the contract as one obligating the defendants or either of them to retire, sell or otherwise take up the plaintiff’s shares of stock, and as in nowise adjudicating any question relating to the term of the contract by which the defendants undertook substantially to use their best efforts to sell the plaintiff’s stock, or any possible breach thereof. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for declaratory judgment as to the rights of parties under a contract concerning disposition of certain shares of stock. The order denies motion to reopen the case.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 793, 292 N.Y.S. 325, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inglehart-v-slauson-nyappdiv-1936.