Inglee v. Welles

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Inglee v. Welles

55 N.W. 117, 53 Minn. 197, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 300

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 3, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 55 N.W. 117 (Inglee v. Welles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inglee v. Welles, 55 N.W. 117, 53 Minn. 197, 1893 Minn. LEXIS 300 (Mich. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the proof of publication of the notice of Us pendens with the summons is sufficient; also, that the nature of the action, and the nonresidence of the named defendant, Delia W. Godding, sufficiently appeared from.the affidavit for publication.

[199]*199We are also of opinion that the mere fact that the named defendant was dead before the action was brought did- not prevent; the court from acquiring jurisdiction to determine the right of “persons or parties unknown” claiming an interest in the land described in the complaint.

These being all the objections to the judgment that are urged by the appellants, the order appealed from must be affirmed.

(Opinion published 55 N. W. Rep. 117.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI