Ingle v. TLC Trucking, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas
DecidedMarch 29, 2022
Docket2:20-cv-02011
StatusUnknown

This text of Ingle v. TLC Trucking, LLC (Ingle v. TLC Trucking, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingle v. TLC Trucking, LLC, (D. Kan. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

KENTON INGLE, individually, ) and on behalf of minor ) Plaintiff A.I., ) Case No. 20-2011-DDC-GEB ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) TLC TRUCKING, LLC and ) GILBERT BARRANCA, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF MINOR’S CLAIMS

Now on this 29th day of March, 2022, the court takes up the Joint Motion for Approval of Minor Settlement (Doc. 74) in the matter of Kenton Ingle, individually and on behalf of minor Plaintiff A.I. v. TLC Trucking, LLC and Gilbert Barranca, Case No. 2:20-CV-2011. Plaintiff appears by and through his attorney of record Michael Kilgore. Defendants TLC Trucking, LLC and Gilbert Barranca appear through their attorney of record, Michael K. Hobbs. This lawsuit arises from a motor vehicle collision. Doc. 69 at 4 (Pretrial Order ¶¶ 2.a.18.–20.); Doc. 19 at 4 (First Am. Compl. ¶ 20). Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against defendants alleging negligence claims under Kansas common law. Doc. 19 at 4–8 (First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 23–36). The court exercises diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Id. at 3 (First Am. Compl. ¶ 13); see also Doc. 69 at 1 (Pretrial Order ¶ 1.a.). Kansas law treats minors “similarly as persons under legal disability[.]” In re Est. of Wise, 890 P.2d 744, 749 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995). Kansas law requires court approval of a settlement contract before it can bind a minor plaintiff. Childs By & Through Harvey v. Williams, 757 P.2d 302, 303 (Kan. 1988). Kansas law requires courts “to exercise extensive oversight, ensuring that the injured minor’s claims are not sold short by an agreed settlement merely outlined at a ‘friendly’ hearing.” White v. Allied Mut. Ins. Co., 31 P.3d 328, 330 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). Courts “‘may not simply rely on the fact that the minor’s parents have consented to the proposed agreement. Instead, the court must determine whether the agreement is in the minor's best interests.’” Id. (quoting Baugh v. Baugh ex rel. Smith, 973 P.2d 202, 205

(Kan. Ct. App. 1999)). Consistent with this Kansas law, the court applies these principles to evaluate this settlement, which involves a minor. The court, having heard the evidence and statements of counsel at the March 29 hearing, having considered the Joint Motion for Approval of Minor Settlement and being fully advised, finds that the facts set forth in the Joint Motion are true and correct, and finds that the terms of the settlement agreement and release are fair and reasonable and that settlement of the claims against Defendants is in the best interest of plaintiff A.I.—a minor—and therefore authorizes Kenton Ingle, Natural Father and legal guardian of A.I., on behalf of the minor, to release defendants TLC Trucking, LLC and Gilbert Barranca in consideration of the total amount of

Twenty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-Seven Dollars and Sixty Five Cents ($24,787.65). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED by the court as follows: 1. The proposed settlement of the claims asserted against Defendants is fair, reasonable, and proper and the court hereby approves the settlement of those claims; 2. That the total amount of Twenty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($24,787.65) is to be disbursed as follows: a. Twenty-Four Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty-Seven Dollars and Sixty-Five Cents ($24,787.65) shall be placed in a restricted interest-bearing account to be used exclusively for the care, maintenance, support, and benefit of A.I., and for no other purpose. The account shall be maintained as a restricted interest- bearing account until A.I. reaches the age of eighteen. 3. Plaintiff and defendants are not aware of outstanding liens related to plaintiff

A.I.’s claims. However, plaintiff Kenton Ingle agrees to satisfy fully and completely any and all valid outstanding liens which have been asserted, including but not limited to any hospital or medical liens, or any outstanding bills arising out of the above-described Occurrence out of the proceeds of this settlement. 4. Kenton Ingle, as Natural Father and legal guardian of A.I., is authorized and directed to execute the settlement agreement and release and such other settlement documents as are reasonably required, and to release defendants TLC Trucking, LLC and Gilbert Barranca from any and all liability to the minor on account of all injuries and damages sustained by the minor as more fully described in the Complaint and per the terms of the settlement agreement

and release, which release is and shall forever be binding upon said minor. 5. Upon payment having been made by defendants to plaintiff in the amount ordered, defendants TLC Trucking, LLC and Gilbert Barranca shall be released from any and all further liability to plaintiffs. 6. The court finds that the total settlement of payments as set forth herein is a fair and reasonable compromise and settlement of all claims brought or which could have been brought arising out of the alleged personal injuries of plaintiff A.I. and by and on behalf of anyone who has sued or is entitled to sue or join in said claims against defendants. 7. After taking into consideration the nature of the liability in this matter, the court finds that the settlement agreement and release is proper and in the best interest of the minor plaintiff A.I. and approves the same. 8. Defendants shall cause payment for the total settlement proceeds to issue as agreed to by the parties and approved by this court.

9. Plaintiff Kenton Ingle shall file a dismissal with prejudice within seven (7) days of receiving the total settlement proceeds. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Minor Settlement (Doc. 74) is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 29th day of March, 2022, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Daniel D. Crabtree Daniel D. Crabtree United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baugh v. Baugh Ex Rel. Smith
973 P.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1999)
Childs Ex Rel. Harvey v. Williams
757 P.2d 302 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1988)
In re the Estate of Wise
890 P.2d 744 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1995)
White v. Allied Mutual Insurance
31 P.3d 328 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ingle v. TLC Trucking, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingle-v-tlc-trucking-llc-ksd-2022.