Ingle v. Ingle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ingle v. Ingle

19 A.D.3d 420, 795 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 420 (Ingle v. Ingle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingle v. Ingle, 19 A.D.3d 420, 795 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 12, 2003, which, after a hearing, extended a temporary order of protection against him until June 12, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from has expired by its own terms. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Levande v Levande, 308 AD2d 450, 451 [2003]).

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Mejias v Aleman, 10 AD3d 421 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the father appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 12, 2003, which, after a hearing, extended a temporary order of protection against him until June 12, 2004.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from has expired by its own terms. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Levande v Levande, 308 AD2d 450, 451 [2003]).

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (cf. Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of Mejias v Aleman, 10 AD3d 421 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 420, 795 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingle-v-ingle-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack