Ingle v. Case

46 Conn. 240
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 15, 1878·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

A reservation of a case for advice, which does not bring up any question as to the jurisdiction of the court or the sufficiency of the declaration or of the pleadings founded upon it, or affecting the merits of the case, will not be entertained by this court.

Replevin, reserved by the District Court of Litchfield County for advice, upon a demurrer to a plea in abatement on the ground of insufficient service upon the defendant.

The judges declined to consider the case, on the' ground that the reservation presented for their advice no question affecting the merits of the case, or relating to the jurisdiction of the court, or the sufficiency of the declaration or the pleadings founded upon it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingle v. Case, 46 Conn. 240 (Colo. 1878).

46 Conn. 240 (Ingle v. Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. Seymour
106 A.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1954)
McDonald v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
111 A. 65 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1920)