Ingham v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ingham v. Price

332 So. 2d 646, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14437

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 1976·No. No. 75-1025·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from an adverse final judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial entered pursuant to an action brought by appellee as an accommodation endorser on a note which appellants, as makers, failed to pay when due. Appel-lee was forced to pay the amount of the note to the promisee bank after it had obtained a judgment against both him and appellants.

We have carefully considered the record, all points in the briefs, and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated by appellants. See, e. g., Fernandez v. Arocha, Fla.App.1975, 308 So.2d 45; Wrains v. Rose, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 75; Frell v. Frell, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 706; Morris v. Truax, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 515, and see 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals §§ 314 and 316. Therefore, for the reason stated and upon the authorities cited, the final judgment and order appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from an adverse final judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial entered pursuant to an action brought by appellee as an accommodation endorser on a note which appellants, as makers, failed to pay when due. Appel-lee was forced to pay the amount of the note to the promisee bank after it had obtained a judgment against both him and appellants.

We have carefully considered the record, all points in the briefs, and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated by appellants. See, e. g., Fernandez v. Arocha, Fla.App.1975, 308 So.2d 45; Wrains v. Rose, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 75; Frell v. Frell, Fla.App.1963, 154 So.2d 706; Morris v. Truax, Fla.App.1963, 152 So.2d 515, and see 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals §§ 314 and 316. Therefore, for the reason stated and upon the authorities cited, the final judgment and order appealed are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ingham v. Price, 332 So. 2d 646, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

332 So. 2d 646 (Ingham v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related