Ingersoll v. Wilson
3 Johns. 437
This text of 3 Johns. 437 (Ingersoll v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ingersoll v. Wilson, 3 Johns. 437 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
Opinion
The special assignment of infancy as error was against the record below, and the fact, as found by" [438]*438the jury, and was, therefore, bad. The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Territory of Florida ex rel. Smith v. Redding
1 Fla. 242 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1847)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Johns. 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingersoll-v-wilson-nysupct-1808.