Ingersoll v. Wilson
3 Johns. 437
Opinion
The special assignment of infancy as error was against the record below, and the fact, as found by" [438] the jury, and was, therefore, bad. The judgment must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingersoll v. Wilson, 3 Johns. 437 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).
3 Johns. 437 (Ingersoll v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Territory of Florida ex rel. Smith v. Redding
1 Fla. 242 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1847)