Ingersoll v. Weld
This text of 101 A.D. 365 (Ingersoll v. Weld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This-motion was unnecessary. The' moving party is a. party to the action, and as such is entitled to notice of all proceedings in the [366]*366action before.the referee or before the court, and to appear and protect any interest he may have, affected by the proceedings before the referee or before the court. .
■ The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars' costs ■ and disbursements.
Present— Van' Brunt, P. J., Patterson, O’Brien, Hatch and Laugh lin, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D. 365, 91 N.Y.S. 1037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingersoll-v-weld-nyappdiv-1905.