Ingersoll v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Ingersoll v. Robinson

35 Ala. 292

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 Ala. 292 (Ingersoll v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingersoll v. Robinson, 35 Ala. 292 (Ala. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.

The plea of set-off in this ease fails to aver that the demand sought to be set off, was a “judgment, bond, covenant, or promise in writing.” It is described as a partnership debt, and hence is not within the statute which declares partnership debts to be several as well as joint. — Code, § 2143.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the second plea. — Duramus v. Harrison, 26 Ala. 326.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

The plea of set-off in this ease fails to aver that the demand sought to be set off, was a “judgment, bond, covenant, or promise in writing.” It is described as a partnership debt, and hence is not within the statute which declares partnership debts to be several as well as joint. — Code, § 2143.

The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to the second plea. — Duramus v. Harrison, 26 Ala. 326.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Ala. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingersoll-v-robinson-ala-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack