Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central
54 A.D.2d 602, 387 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13992
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 1976·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied because the case presents issues of fact for trial, including the conduct both of the defendant and of the plaintiff (see Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-406, and Comment thereunder in McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 6214, Part II, p 263, par 6). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court&emdash;summary judgment.) Present&emdash;Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central, 54 A.D.2d 602, 387 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).
54 A.D.2d 602 (Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.