Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central

54 A.D.2d 602, 387 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13992

This text of 54 A.D.2d 602 (Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingersoll v. Marine Midland Bank-Central, 54 A.D.2d 602, 387 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied because the case presents issues of fact for trial, including the conduct both of the defendant and of the plaintiff (see Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-406, and Comment thereunder in McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 6214, Part II, p 263, par 6). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court&emdash;summary judgment.) Present&emdash;Marsh, P. J., Mahoney, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 602, 387 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingersoll-v-marine-midland-bank-central-nyappdiv-1976.