Ingersoll v. Joseph Brown & Co.

205 Ill. App. 537
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMay 10, 1917
DocketGen. No. 22,349
StatusPublished

This text of 205 Ill. App. 537 (Ingersoll v. Joseph Brown & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingersoll v. Joseph Brown & Co., 205 Ill. App. 537 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Trover and conversion, § 31*-—when notice of election to rescind conditional contract of sale of goods and demand for return is essential. No right of action, in trover for goods sold and delivered upon condition that a certain balance due on a bill for other goods be paid, would accrue without notice by plaintiffs of their election to rescind the contract and a demand for the return of the goods, upon defendant’s failure to make such payment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 Ill. App. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingersoll-v-joseph-brown-co-illappct-1917.