Ingersoll-Rand Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

Ingersoll-Rand Company v. National Labor Relations Board

601 F.2d 255

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 5, 1979·No. 77-1415·Published

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon the petition of the Ingersoll-Rand Company (“the Company”) to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) requiring the company to stop and desist from certain unfair labor practices and from in any manner interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of their statutory rights, and directing the company to offer an employee, who the Board found had been discharged because of his union activity in violation of Sections 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(3) and (1), reinstatement with back pay, and upon the Board’s cross application for enforcement of its order.

Upon due consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties and being fully advised in the premises, the Court is of the view that on the record considered as a whole, the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(f).

Therefore, it is ordered that the Board’s application for enforcement of the order it has entered in this case be, and the same hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon the petition of the Ingersoll-Rand Company (“the Company”) to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) requiring the company to stop and desist from certain unfair labor practices and from in any manner interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of their statutory rights, and directing the company to offer an employee, who the Board found had been discharged because of his union activity in violation of Sections 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(3) and (1), reinstatement with back pay, and upon the Board’s cross application for enforcement of its order.

Upon due consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral arguments of counsel for the parties and being fully advised in the premises, the Court is of the view that on the record considered as a whole, the Board’s findings are supported by substantial evidence. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(f).

Therefore, it is ordered that the Board’s application for enforcement of the order it has entered in this case be, and the same hereby is, granted.

Ingersoll-Rand Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 601 F.2d 255 (6th Cir. 1979).

Pincite

601 F.2d 255 (Ingersoll-Rand Company v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related