Ingerman v. Pool

958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, 2007 WL 1789262
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 2007·No. No. 5D06-706·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enters., 403 So.2d 1325, 1331 (Fla.1981) (holding that “[t]he extent to which parties may examine prospective jurors on voir dire lies within the trial judge’s discretion”).

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingerman v. Pool, 958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, 2007 WL 1789262 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

958 So. 2d 584 (Ingerman v. Pool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc.
403 So. 2d 1325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)