Ingerman v. Pool

958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, 2007 WL 1789262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 2007
DocketNo. 5D06-706
StatusPublished

This text of 958 So. 2d 584 (Ingerman v. Pool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingerman v. Pool, 958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, 2007 WL 1789262 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enters., 403 So.2d 1325, 1331 (Fla.1981) (holding that “[t]he extent to which parties may examine prospective jurors on voir dire lies within the trial judge’s discretion”).

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc.
403 So. 2d 1325 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
958 So. 2d 584, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9593, 2007 WL 1789262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingerman-v-pool-fladistctapp-2007.