Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein
33 A.3d 601, 613 Pa. 315, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2950
This text of 33 A.3d 601 (Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ingerman Affordable Housing, Inc. v. Edelstein, 33 A.3d 601, 613 Pa. 315, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2950 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of December 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a factual dispute to be determined by a jury that they were damaged by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?
(2) Did the Superior Court err in finding that [petitioners] failed to establish sufficient facts of record to create a *316 factual dispute to be determined by a jury that the harm suffered was caused by Walter J. Timby, III, Esquire and Margolis Edelstein?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schneller v. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
33 A.3d 601 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
33 A.3d 601, 613 Pa. 315, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 2950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingerman-affordable-housing-inc-v-edelstein-pa-2011.