Ingebretsen (John) v. State
This text of Ingebretsen (John) v. State (Ingebretsen (John) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
34.724, he was not eligible for post-conviction habeas relief.' See id. For this reason, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Pickering
Saitta
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Federal Public Defender/Las Vegas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
lIngebretsen argues that he satisfied the imprisonment requirement because, at the time that he filed the petition, he had been arrested and released on bail for a charge of violating the conditions of lifetime supervision. A violation of lifetime supervision, however, is a separate offense and does not alter the fact that Ingebretsen was no longer under sentence of imprisonment in district court case number C175709 when he filed the petition. See Jackson v. State, 115 Nev. 21, 23, 973 P.2d 241, 242 (1999); Coleman, 130 Nev. at , 321 P.3d at 865-67.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A •AIS,4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ingebretsen (John) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingebretsen-john-v-state-nev-2014.