Inge v. State
534 S.W.3d 296
This text of 534 S.W.3d 296 (Inge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Inge v. State, 534 S.W.3d 296 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).
Opinion
ORDER
Daryl Inge, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. We find no error has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
534 S.W.3d 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inge-v-state-moctapp-2017.