Inge v. Asheville Power & Light Co.

135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 832, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 445
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 927 (Inge v. Asheville Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inge v. Asheville Power & Light Co., 135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 832, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 445 (N.C. 1926).

Opinion

Peb CubiaM.

The plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in driving its street car upon an automobile in which she was riding. The two issues of negligence and damages were answered in her favor, and from the judgment rendered thereon the defendant appealed.

The only exceptions relate to the instruction given the jury on the second issue. A reasonable interpretation of the instruction excludes the recovery of damages upon any element not supported by the evidence, and we find no sufficient ground for awarding a new trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 927, 192 N.C. 832, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inge-v-asheville-power-light-co-nc-1926.