Ingamells v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern Railroad
This text of 157 A.D. 902 (Ingamells v. Syracuse, Lake Shore & Northern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment of Oswego County Court and judgment and order of City Court of Fulton reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in aU courts to the appellant. Held, that the proof shows that the overcharge was made through inadvertence and mistake not amounting to gross negligence,* and the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. AH concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 A.D. 902, 141 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingamells-v-syracuse-lake-shore-northern-railroad-nyappdiv-1913.