Ingalls v. Crew
101 A.D.2d 995, 476 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18710
Opinion
— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition, denied, and petition dated April 12, 1984 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie if full judicial review can be obtained through the normal avenues of appellate review (see Matter of Legal Aid So c. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12). In light of this decision, the motion for a stay is denied as academic. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingalls v. Crew, 101 A.D.2d 995, 476 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
101 A.D.2d 995 (Ingalls v. Crew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Legal Aid Society of Sullivan County, Inc. v. Scheinman
422 N.E.2d 542 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)