Ingalls v. Crew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ingalls v. Crew

101 A.D.2d 995, 476 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18710

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 31, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.2d 995 (Ingalls v. Crew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingalls v. Crew, 101 A.D.2d 995, 476 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition, denied, and petition dated April 12, 1984 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie if full judicial review can be obtained through the normal avenues of appellate review (see Matter of Legal Aid So c. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12). In light of this decision, the motion for a stay is denied as academic. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, for judgment in the nature of prohibition, denied, and petition dated April 12, 1984 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie if full judicial review can be obtained through the normal avenues of appellate review (see Matter of Legal Aid So c. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12). In light of this decision, the motion for a stay is denied as academic. Kane, J. P., Main, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 A.D.2d 995, 476 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingalls-v-crew-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack