Ingalls Shipbuilding v. Federal Insurance

423 F.3d 522
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 25, 2005
DocketNos. 03-60358, 03-60557
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 423 F.3d 522 (Ingalls Shipbuilding v. Federal Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingalls Shipbuilding v. Federal Insurance, 423 F.3d 522 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (“National Union”) is DENIED, and as no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court has requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Fed. R. App, P. and 5th CiR. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is also DENIED.

The Petition for Panel Rehearing filed by National Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“National Fire”) is GRANTED in part, for the limited purpose of modifying the portion of our opinion that remanded for the district court to re-determine the amount of Transocean’s defense costs for which National Fire is responsible. That portion of our opinion is hereby deleted and withdrawn. Therefore, the district court’s original calculation of the portion of Transocean’s defense costs for which National Fire is obligated is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 F.3d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingalls-shipbuilding-v-federal-insurance-ca5-2005.