Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1123, -1137
INFORMATICA CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,
v.
BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. (formerly known as Acta Technology, Inc.),
Defendant-Appellant.
Lynn H. Pasahow, Fenwick & West, LLP, of Mountain View, California, argued for the plaintiff-cross appellant. With her on the brief were J. David Hadden, Darren E. Donnelly, Carolyn Chang; and Heather N. Mewes and David D. Schumann, of San Francisco, California. Of counsel were David M. Lacy Kusters, Fenwick & West, LLP, of San Francisco, California and Ryan A. Tyz, Fenwick & West, LLP, of Mountain View, California.
Daniel J. Furniss, Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Gregory S. Gilchrist.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1123, -1137
BUSINESS OBJECTS DATA INTEGRATION, INC. (formerly known as Acta Technology, Inc.),
Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
In CASE NO(S). 02-CV-03378.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam: (MAYER, GAJARSA and PROST, Circuit Judges):
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATE:_November 17,2008_ __/s/ Jan_Horbaly______ Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc. (Informatica Corp. v. Business Objects Data Integration, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.