Inflight Advertising, Inc. v. Bindit Corp.

76 A.D.2d 857, 428 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 A.D.2d 857 (Inflight Advertising, Inc. v. Bindit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inflight Advertising, Inc. v. Bindit Corp., 76 A.D.2d 857, 428 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendants from selling certain items to the travel industry in general and to the airline industry in particular, the parties cross-appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 25, 1979, which, inter alia, (1) enjoined defendant Bindit Corporation from using certain binding processes, (2) enjoined defendant Klaus Lueders from engaging in competition with plaintiffs and from disclosing trade secrets, and (3) dismissed certain of plaintiffs’ causes of action against defendant Bindit Corporation and failed to award plaintiffs damages. The defendants’ appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated July 24, 1979, which denied defendants’ motion to amend and clarify the court’s decision. Judg[858]*858ment modified, on the law, by deleting from the third decretal paragraph thereof the words "binding of magazines and other data for the travel industry”, and substituting therefor the words, "binding of magazines and publications for the travel industry”. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The exclusivity agreement between the parties limits the exclusive right granted to plaintiffs to "magazines and publications”. The injunction granted to the plaintiffs should not extend beyond the terms of that agreement to prevent defendants from competing where nonpublished materials are involved. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bindit Corp. v. Inflight Advertising, Inc.
285 A.D.2d 309 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Inflight Newspapers, Inc. v. Magazines In-Flight, LLC
990 F. Supp. 119 (E.D. New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 A.D.2d 857, 428 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inflight-advertising-inc-v-bindit-corp-nyappdiv-1980.