INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Crowder

343 S.W.3d 770, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 978
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 26, 2011·No. WD 72841, WD 73159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*771 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Loretta Hunziker appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Henry County dividing proceeds paid into the court pursuant to a petition for interpleader filed by Infinity Insurance Company. Specifically, Hunziker challenges the trial court’s awarding $1,000.00 of the inter-pleaded funds to her and $49,000.00 to Sharon Crowder. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Crowder, 343 S.W.3d 770, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 978 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

343 S.W.3d 770 (INFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Crowder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Crutchfield
343 S.W.3d 770 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)