Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd.

Ohio Supreme Court

Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd.

2 N.E.3d 267, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 22, 2014

Docket2013-1671

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.E.3d 267 (Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd., 2 N.E.3d 267, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Lucas App. No. L-12-1313, 2013-Ohio-4415. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 13 of the court of appeals’ entry filed October 4, 2013:

“Whether a dismissal entry that does not either embody the terms of a settlement agreement or expressly reserve jurisdiction to the trial court to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement is an unconditional dismissal.”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are Estate of Berger v. Riddle, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga Nos. 66195 and 66200, 1994 WL 449397 (Aug. 18, 1994), and Hines v. Zofko, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 93-T-4928, 1994 WL 117110 (Mar. 22,1994).

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2013-1795, Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd., 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-12-1313, 2013-Ohio-4415.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lucas App. No. L-12-1313, 2013-Ohio-4415. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 13 of the court of appeals’ entry filed October 4, 2013:

“Whether a dismissal entry that does not either embody the terms of a settlement agreement or expressly reserve jurisdiction to the trial court to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement is an unconditional dismissal.”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are Estate of Berger v. Riddle, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga Nos. 66195 and 66200, 1994 WL 449397 (Aug. 18, 1994), and Hines v. Zofko, 11th Dist. Trumbull No. 93-T-4928, 1994 WL 117110 (Mar. 22,1994).

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2013-1795, Infinite Sec. Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties I, Ltd., 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-12-1313, 2013-Ohio-4415.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.E.3d 267, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/infinite-sec-solutions-llc-v-karam-properties-i-ltd-ohio-2014.