Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Infante v. Curley

Infante v. Curley

297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617, 746 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 396 (Infante v. Curley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Infante v. Curley, 297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617, 746 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, denying the appellants’ motion to vacate the order dated August 20, 2002. The appellants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious claim (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see Matter of Boy-land v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 122 AD2d 902, 903). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baptiste v. Emmanuel
21 A.D.3d 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617, 746 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/infante-v-curley-nyappdiv-2002.