Infante v. Curley
297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617, 746 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8157
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 28, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by, in effect, denying the appellants’ motion to vacate the order dated August 20, 2002. The appellants failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default or a meritorious claim (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see Matter of Boy-land v Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 122 AD2d 902, 903). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, McGinity, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Infante v. Curley, 297 A.D.2d 396, 746 N.Y.2d 617, 746 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 396 (Infante v. Curley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baptiste v. Emmanuel
21 A.D.3d 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)