Inez Manigault v. Jane Thorn-Henderson

Opinion

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS ia-m-ooiS(&-ci> 12th Court of Appeals D!?ti

jun -8 201

v TABLE OF CONTENTS TYLER TEXAS CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS Hi

INDEX OF ALTTHORrnES iv-vii

STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1

STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT 1

STATEMENT OF FACTS 1-9

ISSUES PRESENTED 9-10

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 11-12

ARGUMENT 12-26

CONCLUSION AND PRAYER FOR RELIEF 26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

ISSUES PRESENTED/ENUMERATION OF ERRORS

1. Was the jury selection a fundamental error and prejudicial?

2. The trial court erred in entering judgment because there were legally sufficient evidence to support the claim in damages in this lawsuit.

3. Is there factually sufficient evidence to support the juror's findings and judgment of the trial court?

4. There were legally and factually sufficient evidence of the reasonableness and

necessity of medical expenses to prove a reasonable compensation for physical impairment, loss of earning capacity sustained in the accident for physical pain and mental anguish physical impairment she suffered in the past; and medical expenses, and not submitting mental anguish and physical pain as a single submission.