Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company

411 F. App'x 10
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2011
Docket10-3288
StatusUnpublished

This text of 411 F. App'x 10 (Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inez Hunter v. Ford Motor Company, 411 F. App'x 10 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Inez Hunter appeals following the district court’s 1 denial of her Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motions in her civil action. After careful review, this court finds no abuse its discretion in the denial of Rule 60(b) relief. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.2001) (standard of review).

Accordingly, this court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Patrick J. Schütz, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Janie S. Mayeron, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 F. App'x 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inez-hunter-v-ford-motor-company-ca8-2011.