Inez Gilpin v. Jennie M. Sherr, Also Known as Jean Mellon and James Walls v. Lester Harris and Barbara Harris James Walls
328 F.2d 884, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060
Opinion
Upon an examination of the record in this case, it appears clearly that under the provisions of Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C., there is no order terminating the action as to any of the claims or parties. The appellant has not seen fit to attempt to make use of the provisions of Section 1292(b), Title 28, U.S.C. Since this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal, it will be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Inez Gilpin v. Jennie M. Sherr, Also Known as Jean Mellon and James Walls v. Lester Harris and Barbara Harris James Walls, 328 F.2d 884, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 6060 (3d Cir. 1964).
328 F.2d 884 (Inez Gilpin v. Jennie M. Sherr, Also Known as Jean Mellon and James Walls v. Lester Harris and Barbara Harris James Walls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Victor A. Peralta v. Quad Tool and Dye Supply Co., Third-Party v. Alva Allen Industries, Third-Party
370 F.2d 103 (Third Circuit, 1966)
McGilton v. Mobay Chemical Co.
40 F.R.D. 483 (N.D. West Virginia, 1966)
Gilpin v. Abraham
231 F. Supp. 511 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1964)