INESTIN PETIT-HOMME v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 2019
Docket18-3710
StatusPublished

This text of INESTIN PETIT-HOMME v. STATE OF FLORIDA (INESTIN PETIT-HOMME v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
INESTIN PETIT-HOMME v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

INESTIN PETIT-HOMME, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D18-3710

[November 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-1620 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
INESTIN PETIT-HOMME v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inestin-petit-homme-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.