Inemer v. Patlis
This text of 235 A.D. 626 (Inemer v. Patlis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the defect complained of was not shown to have existed prior to the accident and that to establish a cause of action it was [627]*627incumbent upon plaintiff to prove notice, either actual or constructive. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 626, 254 N.Y.S. 1057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inemer-v-patlis-nyappdiv-1932.