Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation
This text of 513 F. App'x 858 (Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
InDyne, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Abacus Technology Corporation, Jerry Reninger, and Matthew Boylan on the copyright infringement claim brought by InDyne. InDyne contends that the district court erred when it concluded that InDyne failed to present sufficient evidence of the copyrighted material. Having carefully considered the record and the parties’ briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM on the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the district court, InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 876 F.Supp.2d 1278 (M.D.Fla.2012).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 F. App'x 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indyne-inc-v-abacus-technology-corporation-ca11-2013.