Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation

Eleventh Circuit

Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation

513 F. App'x 858

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 20, 2013·No. 12-13345·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

InDyne, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Abacus Technology Corporation, Jerry Reninger, and Matthew Boylan on the copyright infringement claim brought by InDyne. InDyne contends that the district court erred when it concluded that InDyne failed to present sufficient evidence of the copyrighted material. Having carefully considered the record and the parties’ briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM on the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the district court, InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 876 F.Supp.2d 1278 (M.D.Fla.2012).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

InDyne, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Abacus Technology Corporation, Jerry Reninger, and Matthew Boylan on the copyright infringement claim brought by InDyne. InDyne contends that the district court erred when it concluded that InDyne failed to present sufficient evidence of the copyrighted material. Having carefully considered the record and the parties’ briefs and having heard oral argument, we AFFIRM on the basis of the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of the district court, InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Tech. Corp., 876 F.Supp.2d 1278 (M.D.Fla.2012).

Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation, 513 F. App'x 858 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

513 F. App'x 858 (Indyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related