Industry Network v. Armstrong
Opinion
Opinions of the United 1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
5-4-1995
Industry Network v Armstrong Precedential or Non-Precedential:
Docket 94-5132
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995
Recommended Citation "Industry Network v Armstrong" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 109. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/109
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Nos. 94-5132 and 94-5164
THE INDUSTRY NETWORK SYSTEM, INC.
V.
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
STEVEN M. KRAMER, Appellant
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY (D.C. Civil Action No. 84-03837)
Argued December 1, 1994
Before: HUTCHINSON and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges and SEITZ, Senior Circuit Judge
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
It is hereby ordered that the Court's Opinion be
corrected as follows:
On page 4, line 5 of the slip opinion, after the
numeral 3 for the footnote, delete the rest of the paragraph to
the Roman numeral I.
On page 8, the next to last line, put a period "."
after "misplaced," and delete the rest of the sentence.
On page 9, line 1, delete "as in Pennsylvania."
BY THE COURT
/S/ Richard L. Nygaard Circuit Judge
Dated: May 4, 1995
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Industry Network v. Armstrong (Industry Network v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.