Industrias Truck de Mexico, S. A. v. Tuck Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Industrias Truck de Mexico, S. A. v. Tuck Industries, Inc.

51 A.D.2d 526, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 526 (Industrias Truck de Mexico, S. A. v. Tuck Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Industrias Truck de Mexico, S. A. v. Tuck Industries, Inc., 51 A.D.2d 526, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on April 30, 1975 unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent. The reasonableness of the substitute or "cover” goods (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-712), the proper amount paid as Mexican import duty, as well as other items of damage all presented questions of fact for jury determination. We have examined the various other errors claimed by appellant and find them without merit. The case was fairly submitted to the jury on the evidence. We find no error to justify our interference with the judgment appealed from. Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on April 30, 1975 unanimously affirmed with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent. The reasonableness of the substitute or "cover” goods (Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-712), the proper amount paid as Mexican import duty, as well as other items of damage all presented questions of fact for jury determination. We have examined the various other errors claimed by appellant and find them without merit. The case was fairly submitted to the jury on the evidence. We find no error to justify our interference with the judgment appealed from. Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 526, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrias-truck-de-mexico-s-a-v-tuck-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1976.