Industrial Video Technologies, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
This text of 47 So. 3d 969 (Industrial Video Technologies, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee Travelers acknowledges that the circuit court, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(a), should have reissued its order denying the appellant’s motion for rehearing so that the appellant could pursue a timely appeal of the circuit court’s final order of dismissal and the court’s order denying the appellant’s motion for rehearing. We therefore treat as timely the appellant’s appeal of those two orders. Having considered the merits of the appeal of those two orders, we affirm the orders without further comment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 So. 3d 969, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-video-technologies-inc-v-travelers-indemnity-co-fladistctapp-2010.