Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong
This text of 124 S.W. 236 (Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(after stating the facts). The court erred in rendering judgment for the penalty and attorney’s fee. The error appeared in the judgment. A motion for new trial was therefore unnecessary to bring it to the attention of this court. Gates v. School District, 57 Ark. 370; Norman v. Fife, 61 Ark. 33.
The question here involved is ruled by the decision of this court in the recent case of Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Carter, 92 Ark. 378. The judgment for penalty and attorney’s fee is reversed, and judgment is entered here for appellee in the sum of $30, and appellee will pay the costs of this appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 S.W. 236, 93 Ark. 84, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-mutual-indemnity-co-v-armstrong-ark-1910.