Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong

124 S.W. 236, 93 Ark. 84, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 274
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 3, 1910·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts). The court erred in rendering judgment for the penalty and attorney’s fee. The error appeared in the judgment. A motion for new trial was therefore unnecessary to bring it to the attention of this court. Gates v. School District, 57 Ark. 370; Norman v. Fife, 61 Ark. 33.

The question here involved is ruled by the decision of this court in the recent case of Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Carter, 92 Ark. 378. The judgment for penalty and attorney’s fee is reversed, and judgment is entered here for appellee in the sum of $30, and appellee will pay the costs of this appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong, 124 S.W. 236, 93 Ark. 84, 1910 Ark. LEXIS 274 (Ark. 1910).

124 S.W. 236 (Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Fire Insurance v. Kight
47 S.W.2d 576 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1932)
American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Turner
226 S.W. 487 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance v. Friedman
174 S.W. 215 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1915)
Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Milham
145 S.W. 540 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. Bramlett
145 S.W. 541 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)