Industrial Energy Usersohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

D.C. Circuit

Industrial Energy Usersohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

219 F. App'x 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 16, 2007

DocketNo. 05-1435

StatusPublished

This text of 219 F. App'x 1 (Industrial Energy Usersohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Industrial Energy Usersohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 219 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

The petition for review of orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was considered on the briefs and the joint appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied for the reasons stated in paragraphs 23-25 of the Commission’s Order Denying Rehearing, 112 F.E.R.C. ¶ 61,320, at 62,432-33 (2005), in which the Commission adequately considered and responded to petitioner’s arguments.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

The petition for review of orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission was considered on the briefs and the joint appendix filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review is denied for the reasons stated in paragraphs 23-25 of the Commission’s Order Denying Rehearing, 112 F.E.R.C. ¶ 61,320, at 62,432-33 (2005), in which the Commission adequately considered and responded to petitioner’s arguments.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-energy-usersohio-v-federal-energy-regulatory-commission-cadc-2007.