Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co.

176 P. 290, 65 Colo. 554

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Colo. 279 →

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided June 3, 1918·No. No. 9289·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

This case involves the same questions as those which were determined in Industrial Commission et al. v. Maryland Casualty Co., No. [555]*5559288, recently decided, 176 Pac. 288. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the last mentioned case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Decided June 3d, A. D., 1918. Rehearing denied December 2d, A. D. 1918.

Judgment affirmed.

Chief Justice Hill and Mr. Justice Scott dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Teller.

Decided June 3d, A. D., 1918. Rehearing denied December 2d, A. D. 1918.

Judgment affirmed.

Chief Justice Hill and Mr. Justice Scott dissent.

Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co., 176 P. 290, 65 Colo. 554 (Colo. 1918).

Pincite

176 P. 290 (Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Industrial Commission v. Maryland Casualty Co.

176 P. 288 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1918)

Opinion

Related