Industrial Commission v. Hartman
This text of 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 679 (Industrial Commission v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; and this court coming now to render the judgment which should have been rendered by the court of appeals upon the undisputed facts appearing in the record, the judgment of the court of common pleas is reversed and judgment rendered for plaintiff in error on the authority of the case of Industrial Commission v. Glenn, 101 Ohio St., 454.
Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-commission-v-hartman-ohio-1921.