Industrial Commission v. Barber

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 782
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Industrial Commission v. Barber. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 373
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 30, 1927·No. No. 20444·Published

Opinion

1. An employe, who for the purpose of reaching his place of employment travels a course which affords the only unobstructed access thereto, enters the course of his employment within the contemplation of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, when he reaches -the zone of such employment that is under the control of his employer, even though such zone be outside the enclosure of the employer.

2. The hazards of such zone growing out ■of the conditions and environments of the employment, and an injury received by an employes due to such hazards is compensable out of the industrial insurance fund of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Judgment affirmed.

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Allen and Matthias, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Industrial Commission v. Barber, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 782 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 782 (Industrial Commission v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.