Industrial Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cunningham

1938 OK 359, 80 P.2d 228, 183 Okla. 125, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 194
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 24, 1938·No. No. 28512.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by transcript. The appeal is from the order sustaining the motion for a new trial. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the order sustaining the motion for new trial is not a part of the record. The appeal must be dismissed. This court has many times held that motions and rulings thereon are no part of the record and cannot be presented to this court by transcript. Chase v. Byrnes, 147 Okla. 118, 294 P. 786; Adams Royalty Co. v. Faulkner, 176 Okla. 423, 55 P.2d 1033; Mitchell v. Peerson, 179 Okla. 521, 66 P.2d 1.

The appeal is dismissed.

BAYLESS, Y. C. J., and PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Industrial Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cunningham, 1938 OK 359, 80 P.2d 228, 183 Okla. 125, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 194 (Okla. 1938).

1938 OK 359 (Industrial Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bowman v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Company
1963 OK 197 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1963)