Industrial Bank v. Sirman

159 S.E. 400, 172 Ga. 868, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 227
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 11, 1931
DocketNo. 8208
StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 400 (Industrial Bank v. Sirman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Industrial Bank v. Sirman, 159 S.E. 400, 172 Ga. 868, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 227 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Under the facts pleaded in the petition, no evidence being submitted, it does not appear that the trial judge abused his discretion in granting the interlocutory injunction excepted to.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 400, 172 Ga. 868, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/industrial-bank-v-sirman-ga-1931.