Industrial Bank v. Jack
285 A.D. 844, 137 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5765
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. The issue of the validity of the complaint was not before us. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Imrie and Zeller, JJ. [See 284 App. Div. 1083.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Industrial Bank v. Jack, 285 A.D. 844, 137 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).
285 A.D. 844 (Industrial Bank v. Jack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Industrial Bank of Schenectady v. Jack
284 A.D. 1083 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)