Indussa Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Indussa Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 339, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2161

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1967

DocketC.D. 3157

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 339 (Indussa Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indussa Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 339, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2161 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, Judge:

The above case has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties which reads as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United _ States that the items marked “A” and initialed GKY (Examiner’s Initials) by George K. Yamauchi (Examiner’s name) on the invoices covered by the above protest and assessed with duty at 1.2⅜ per pound under Tariff Item 646.80, in fact consist of deck spikes composed of iron, not having heads of non-ferrous metals, of one piece construction made of round wire one inch or more in length and .065", or more in diameter.

IT IS FURTHER CLAIMED that said deck spikes are classifiable at .20 per pound under Item 646.26 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this protest be submitted on this stipulation, being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation, we find and hold that the merchandise marked “A” and initialed on the invoice by the designated examiner consists of deck spikes composed of iron, not having heads of nonferrous metals, of one piece construction made of round wire 1 inch or more in length and 0.065 inch or more in diameter. Therefore, the claim in the protest that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 0.2 cent per pound under the provisions of item 646.26, Tariff Schedules of the United States, is sustained.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, Judge:

The above case has been submitted for decision upon a written stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties which reads as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United _ States that the items marked “A” and initialed GKY (Examiner’s Initials) by George K. Yamauchi (Examiner’s name) on the invoices covered by the above protest and assessed with duty at 1.2⅜ per pound under Tariff Item 646.80, in fact consist of deck spikes composed of iron, not having heads of non-ferrous metals, of one piece construction made of round wire one inch or more in length and .065", or more in diameter.

IT IS FURTHER CLAIMED that said deck spikes are classifiable at .20 per pound under Item 646.26 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this protest be submitted on this stipulation, being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid.

Accepting the foregoing stipulation, we find and hold that the merchandise marked “A” and initialed on the invoice by the designated examiner consists of deck spikes composed of iron, not having heads of nonferrous metals, of one piece construction made of round wire 1 inch or more in length and 0.065 inch or more in diameter. Therefore, the claim in the protest that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 0.2 cent per pound under the provisions of item 646.26, Tariff Schedules of the United States, is sustained.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 339, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indussa-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.