Indus. Energy Users-Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Indus. Energy Users-Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.

734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2296

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 6, 2000

Docket00-1576

StatusPublished

This text of 734 N.E.2d 833 (Indus. Energy Users-Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Indus. Energy Users-Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm., 734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2296 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of relator’s request for immediate issuance of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ. Pfeifer, J., would deny the request. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition.

Upon consideration of relator’s request for immediate issuance of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ. Pfeifer, J., would deny the request. Cook, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/indus-energy-users-ohio-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-2000.