Induddi v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Induddi v. Moore

214 A.D.2d 616, 624 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 214 A.D.2d 616 (Induddi v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Induddi v. Moore, 214 A.D.2d 616, 624 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered March 3, 1993, as denied that branch of her petition which was for a modification of a prior amended order, entered April 29, 1992, which sought overnight, alternate weekend, and alternate holiday visitation, on the ground that there was no change of circumstances.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The mother did not allege any reason to justify a reconsideration of the visitation order entered upon consent of the parties inasmuch as no material change in circumstances was presented (see, Family Ct Act § 467 [b] [ii]).

We have examined the mother’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered March 3, 1993, as denied that branch of her petition which was for a modification of a prior amended order, entered April 29, 1992, which sought overnight, alternate weekend, and alternate holiday visitation, on the ground that there was no change of circumstances.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The mother did not allege any reason to justify a reconsideration of the visitation order entered upon consent of the parties inasmuch as no material change in circumstances was presented (see, Family Ct Act § 467 [b] [ii]).

We have examined the mother’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 616, 624 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/induddi-v-moore-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack